Rutgers School of Law
Journal of Law & Urban Policy
SEARCH JLUP BLOG ABOUT US UPCOMING EVENTS MASTHEAD CONTACT US
Basic Income
Volume 2, Issue 1: Basic Income

Basic Income provides a series of global and domestic scholarly articles that examine the merits of government sponsored wealth redistribution policies focusing on employment and basic income guarantees.
complete issue - Word
In this paper Philip Harvey argues that basic income advocates have been too ready to reject the conventional definition of the right to work, too willing to embrace the assumption that it cannot be secured by reasonable means, and too quick to conclude that a basic income guarantee would provide an adequate substitute for it... [read more]

In this article, the authors compare and contrast two major economic theories to combat the problem of "income insecurity." They contend that the Basic Income model - the proposition that governments should provide all citizens with a basic income which they may then supplement with work - is flawed in that it doesn't attack the root problem of income insecurity... [read more]

Guy Standing argues that the right to work, in the sense of having free choice, does not necessarily conflict with the right to basic income security as many scholars believe. Instead, basic income is one of many necessary conditions to the achievement of the right to work... [read more]

In this paper Jose Antonio Noguera argues that the idea of basic income, an unconditional income guarantee, is directly embodied within the moral intuitions that underlie the political traditions that built the modern welfare state. Unconditional income guarantees should not be subjected to any kind of work conditions... [read more]
This paper advances two arguments. First, basic income guarantees are unlikely to achieve their objectives, because such proposals have an inherent highly inflationary bias with disastrous consequences for the currency. Secondly, this paper contends that certain direct job creation programs, such as ELR, achieve most of the common goals that income and job guarantee supporters share, without the problem of inflation.... [read more]

This article proposes an alternative to the two major research models that have been posited: a lottery game designed specifically for the implementation of a Basic Income experiment as a means for collecting research data. The proposal calls for a self-funded lottery game in which the winners receive Basic Income for life, similar to Win for Life lottery games. [read more]

Scholarly debates concerning basic income, job guarantees, the right to work, employer of last resort, and their policy implications have become riddled with confusion and misunderstanding. Many of these misunderstandings stem from the fact that we do not all have the same policy goals in mind.... [read more]

Most discussions concerning the efficacy of adopting a basic income policy weigh the need to mitigate social injustice against the long-term sustainability of basic income policies. Perhaps a more important question is whether a guaranteed basic income policy can be incorporated into a capitalist society, or whether it would create such a broad divergence from capitalism that socialism or statism would emerge? ... [read more]

In this paper John Tomlinson proposes a blueprint for a sensible employment policy in Australia. The blueprint accounts for unemployment "solutions" suggested in Australia since the end of the Second World War, though it focuses upon more recent suggestions.... [read more]

Michael A. Lewis



Jose Luis Rey Perez
Copyright Permission Membership Selection Resources Alumni

© Rutgers Journal of Law and Urban Policy ISSN: 1556-5149
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
217 North Fifth Street, Camden NJ 08102
site designers: Jennifer Colangelo, Daniel Garrie, Matt Armstrong